查看完整版本: 2月2号成绩问题

2月2号成绩问题

[table=70%][tr][td][b]Test [/b][/td][td][b]Test Date [/b][/td][td][b]Reading [/b][/td][td][b]Listening [/b][/td][td][b]Speaking [/b][/td][td][b]Writing [/b][/td][td][b]Total [/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]TELXML[/td][td]February 1, 2008[/td][td]26 [/td][td]19 [/td][td]19 [/td][td]21 [/td][td]85 [/td][/tr][/table]:'(
7K{G9H|%~
Ix5K 这次成绩作文才21但一个Fair一个Good，上次考的时候也是这个档次得了27，怎么差这么多啊？！综合写作我听的还挺好的，跟别人对的时候踩分点大部分都有，独立写作写的感觉没上次好但也写了450多字不至于这么差啊？！E@ DT"FTe8H
我都郁闷死了，又没上90，上次就是听力给搞成6分，这次听力又没搞好，听的很好不知怎么又错这么多，唉！zVpq LYSB
我口语最后一题说砸了，我觉得肯定是0分可最后学术类话题还是个Fair，校园类话题竟然是Limit，还有就是前两个独立口语还不是Good，也是事先写出来的答案而且说的时候注意了加小词一类的，没说很顺，还是不行。
iUxW1W6[g~ 开始阅读一直没进状态成绩倒还凑合:L0d5C;C t3zM6D{4v
%_} nhKP
[[i] 本帖最后由 小马学生会 于 2008-5-21 13:06 编辑 [/i]]

对这个考试真是无语了vL!S @m%@'n4wx%`a
我也是2月2^ DF$[+Ps;|T
阅读比想象中高。。。听力又低好多

你最好把你的ETS点评那个表格复制上来,一起帮你找问题:)

其实这个y

[table=70%][tr][td][b]Test [/b][/td][td][b]Test Date [/b][/td][td][b]Reading [/b][/td][td][b]Listening [/b][/td][td][b]Speaking [/b][/td][td][b]Writing [/b][/td][td][b]Total [/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]TELXML[/td][td]February 1, 2008[/td][td]26 [/td][td]19 [/td][td]19 [/td][td]21 [/td][td]85 [/td][/tr][/table].M7T Ur:LDI4|6C_U
r{M&fx{T;R
[table=98%][tr][td=1,1,20%][b]Reading  Skills [/b][/td][td=1,1,15%][b]Level [/b][/td][td=1,1,65%][b]Your Performance [/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]Reading[/td][td][b]High[/b]
.`cXi,K*G [/td][td]Test takers who receive a score at the [b]HIGH[/b] level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.0Txs-v`5i`
Test takers who score at the [b]HIGH[/b] level, typically(c2v.v'Q)Um^
[list][*]have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;[*]can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;[*]can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and[*]can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.[/list][/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,20%][b]Listening  Skills [/b][/td][td=1,1,15%][b]Level [/b][/td][td=1,1,65%][b]Your Performance [/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]Listening[/td][td][b]Intermediate[/b]
*U4l+t Dybr [/td][td]Test takers who receive a score at the [b]INTERMEDIATE[/b] level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, and/or abstract or complex ideas. However, lectures and conversations that require the listener to make sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information may present some difficulty.[(fl~'kN4xZ
When listening to conversations and lectures like these, test takers at the [b]INTERMEDIATE[/b] level typically can
`XrYbC9Vy [list][*]understand explicitly stated main ideas and important details, especially if they are reinforced, but may have difficulty understanding main ideas that must be inferred or important details that are not reinforced;[*]understand how information is being used (for example, to provide support or describe a step in a complex process);[*]recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);[*]understand, though perhaps not consistently, ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and[*]synthesize information from adjacent parts of a lecture or conversation and make correct inferences on the basis of that information, but may have difficulty synthesizing information from separate parts of a lecture or conversation.[/list][/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,20%][b]Speaking  Skills [/b][/td][td=1,1,15%][b]Level [/b][/td][td=1,1,65%][b]Your Performance [/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]Speaking about familiar topics[/td][td][b]Fair(2.5 - 3.0) [/b][/td][td]Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.L+e-`#Oo
@0W^7r-v
[/td][/tr][tr][td]Speaking about campus situations[/td][td][b]Limited(1.5 - 2.0) [/b][/td][td]Your responses indicate that you have some difficulty speaking in English about information from conversations, newspaper articles, university publications, and so on. While you are able to talk about some of the key information from these sources, limited grammar and vocabulary may prevent you from fully expressing your ideas. Problems with pronunciation make it difficult for listeners to understand you at times.
@1r%q8o]CV)S];\B [/td][/tr][tr][td]Speaking about academic course content[/td][td][b]Fair(2.5 - 3.0) [/b][/td][td]Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are not fully developed or are inaccurate.u-bi*l
{#M
[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,20%][b]Writing  Skills [/b][/td][td=1,1,15%][b]Level [/b][/td][td=1,1,65%][b]Your Performance [/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]Writing based on reading and listening[/td][td][b]Fair(2.5 - 3.5) [/b][/td][td]You responded to the task, relating the lecture to the reading, but your response indicates weaknesses such as
.g/K-H'T-Z$s w [list][*]an important idea or ideas may be missing, unclear, or inaccurate;[*]there may be unclarity in how the lecture and the reading passage are related; and/or[*]grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.[/list][/td][/tr][tr][td]Writing based on knowledge and experience[/td][td][b]Good(4.0 - 5.0) [/b][/td][td]You responded with a well-organized and developed essay. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with
1IAhP.I2TbvCEU [list][*]use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical, unclear, or unidiomatic and/or[*]elaboration of ideas or connection of ideas that could have been stronger.[/list][/td][/tr][/table]
#Qv&Zohh2RCSQ
S'B~ Hq.D.h [[i] 本帖最后由 zfz1984 于 2008-2-28 15:54 编辑 [/i]]

我也是2月2日考的，情况跟你一样咧，尤其是听力和作文，是不是与考试难易程度，或当天参加考试的普遍水平有关啊？这是第一次考，准备好了，第二次。

我也是啊 听力作文下来低的离谱 觉得判分有问题