查看完整版本: 踏上听写跟读正途!!!!

19811010316 2008-9-1 16:06

[b][font=Times New Roman]Lecture 1: Sternberg’s intelligence model[/font][/b]
z/A]-e%`+G:T9|Z] [font=Times New Roman]Recent research indicates that the commonly used models of intelligence are too narrow. Last time, we began talking about Sternberg’s three part model of intelligence. You’ll recall that his theory includes some aspects of intelligence that haven’t been [color=red]considered[/color] in traditional intelligence testing. Today, we’ll take up one part of Sternberg’s theory. In this part, he tries to account for the relationship of intelligence to the environment. Intelligent people tend to use the environment to accomplish their goals. This is done in three ways, by adapting to the environment, by changing the environment or by selecting out of the environment. Let’s look at a[color=blue] hypothetic[/color] case, suppose you roommate always studies with radio[color=red] on.[/color] You know that you need quiet in order to concentrate and thus use your study time effectively. You could try wearing your ear-plug while you study, that would be adaption, or you could set up a new study corner for yourself far from the radio, that’s changing the environment, finally, you could change rooms and find a new roommate, that’s selecting out of the environment. Whichever solution you choose, you are showing intelligent behavior because you are aware of the effect the environment has on your ability to study. Of course, you might say why don’t I just talk to my roommate about the problem? That brings us to a different part of Sternberg’s model, interpersonal intelligence. [/font]*@,d8nb:x1s
[font=Times New Roman][/font]
LD n+y#`c [font=Times New Roman]感觉自己进步了许多,但是还没有达到我要的战神水平。[/font]
5F,_HLMWm ])g [font=Times New Roman]我要坚持到考试前的最后一天。[/font]
k2zG&qz3U4` [font=Times New Roman][/font]

19811010316 2008-9-3 21:28

[b][color=red][font=Times New Roman]Lecture 13: Octopus[/font][/color][/b]
2@ H^,g8[[ [font=Times New Roman]I like to start today’s lecture by challenging some of the[color=red] myths[/color] about certain animals considered to be predators of human. Take the case of wolf. People fear wolf because the tales of how wolves attack and eat people walking through the woods. In fact, if you encountered the wolves in the wild, it will probably run away. Another animal wrongly accuse to harming people is the giant octopus. Stories have been told about the terrifying giant octopus attacking and eating an entire ship. But unless you are the crab or some such, you don’t have much to fear for a giant octopus even the hungry one. One myth probably get by such stories concerns the size of octopus, diverse report that on average it has a arm standard on two and half meters—large certainly, but hardly a ship eating size. Far from being an attacker. The giant octopuses have a number of talents that make it especially adapted escaping. It has no skeletal structure, so despite its large size it can squeeze to a hole as small as five centimeters wide and if it’s caught, for example, in the mouth of the shark. It can pull away leaving one or more its arms. They will grow back or it has been pursued or it squirts back ink which some scientists believe that takes on the form of another octopus and thus confuse the predator. And if that’s not enough the giant octopus have the[color=red] chameleon[/color] like ability to change the skin color to match its surrounding.[/font]

19811010316 2008-9-3 21:28

[b][font=Times New Roman]Lecture 12: The origin of bird[/font][/b]
d3]5VM be [font=Times New Roman]Birds are sometimes referred to as glorified reptile. And even though modern birds are structurally very different from reptile, some show minor evidence of their ancestry, like scales on their feet or claws on their toes. However flying reptile disappeared more than 70 million years ago, but birds have obviously managed to survive. You’ll remember that biological success of any group of organism is measured by the number of species and individuals in the group. There are distributions throughout the world and of course their ability to adapt to all kinds of environmental conditions. On the basis of these criteria birds are considered one of the most successful vertebrate in modern times. Their success means they were probably not only better adapted than reptile for flying but also for life on land and on water. But when did the glorification begin and how fast did the changes occur? It was seen logical to assume that at some time millions of years ago transitional stages between reptiles and birds existed. And in fact one of the most important clues came with the discovery of the fossils called Archaeopteryx which literally means ancient bird. The archaeopteryx dates back 150 million years to the Jurassic period. Fortunately the fossils not only included the skeleton but also impressions of the feathers of the wings and the double rare tail feathers. If it were not for these feathers, scientist would have classified it as a reptile because it has many characteristics more like a lizard than a bird. Archaeopteryx is not, however, considered as the ancestor of modern birds. But it probably was derived from ancestral form that also gave rise to modern birds. Up until the mid 1980s the Archaeopteryx was considered the most ancient of all birds. Then in 1986, a fossil was discovered called Portolisilous that show a mixture of dinosaur and bird-like characteristics. But it lived 225 million years ago, about 75 millions years before the Archaeopteryx. So clearly the final word is not yet in on the origin of birds.[/font]

双吉 2008-10-12 22:39

楼主也不来说说考得怎么样了?4u`eNE q7d
起码说下听力的分啊?

pocoyo 2008-10-22 18:47

成绩怎么样?群众们都很关心啊~
页: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
查看完整版本: 踏上听写跟读正途!!!!